Representing archaeology’s full complexity or too many assumptions about things you cannot know?
Agent-based Modelling (ABM), a simulation method that allows modelling the interaction of individual "agents" in explicit space and time, is recently gaining momentum in Archaeology (Rogers & Cegielski 2017, Lake 2014). Proponents of ABM emphasize that it allows representing archaeology’s full complexity (Barceló & Castillo 2016). At the same time, the preconceptions that are often associated with formal modelling are amplified by ABMs (Cegielski & Rogers 2016). One may summarize these preconceptions with the claim that ABMs make too many assumptions about things you cannot know. Should this methodology be rejected, if so many ad-hoc assumptions are necessary? Quite the opposite argues Edmund Chattoe-Brown (2013, §9.1): "ABM gives us a perspective from which to unpick preconceptions (based on existing research methods)". Especially in situations where we do not have enough evidence yet – and probably never will – using ABMs can be paramount as a tool for theory building: “models are not depictions of reality, but formal thought experiments designed to test and explore specific research questions” argue Drost and Vander Linden (2018).
14:00 to 14:10
14:10 to 14:30
Maja Gori & Frederik Schaff, Ruhr-University Bochum
14:30 to 15:15
Edmund Chattoe-Brown, University of Leicester
15:15 to 16:00
Marc Vander Linden, University of Cambridge
16:00 to 16:30
Edmund Chattoe-Brown (University of Leicester)
Marc Vander Lindern (University of Cambridge)
Iza Romanowska (Barcelona Supercomputing Center)
Michael Roos (Ruhr-University Bochum)
Moderation: Maja Gori & Frederik Schaff
16:30 to 17:00
Questions and comments from the local audience. This part is excluded from the streaming.
Snack & Chat open to all participants
We kindly ask you to register if you plan to come. Your data will only be used for the registration. When you register with the form below, your current IP will also be saved with the information you provide, to mitigate misuse.
You may also write us from your own device to email@example.com
Barceló JA & F del Castillo (2016): Simulating the Past for Understanding the Present. A Critical Review. Chapter 1. In JA Barceló, F del Castillo (eds.): Simulating prehistoric and ancient worlds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer (Computational social sciences).
Drost CJ & M Vander Linden (2018): Toy Story. Homophily, Transmission and the Use of Simple Simulation Models for Assessing Variability in the Archaeological Record. In Journal for Archaeological Method and Theory 122 (2): 1087–1108.
Chattoe-Brown E (2013): Why Sociology Should Use Agent Based Modelling. In Sociological Research Online 18 (3): 1–11.
Cegielski, Wendy H.; Rogers, J. Daniel (2016): Rethinking the role of Agent-Based Modeling in archaeology. In Journal Of Anthropological Archaeology 41: 283–298.
Lake, M. W. (2014): Trends in Archaeological Simulation. In Journal of Archaeological Methodology and Theory 21 (2), pp. 258–287.
Rogers, J. Daniel; Cegielski, Wendy H. (2017): Opinion. Building a better past with the help of agent-based modeling. In PNAS 114 (49): 12841–12844.
A live stream of the event will be available on YouTube